The examples in the U-boot docs use "hash-N" and "signature-N" as the names
for hash/signature nodes. It seems "@N" was used instead at some point
during the development of the FIT format and "-N" is more correct (in fact,
dtc throws warnings when using "@N" without a reg attribute). Support for
the "@N" node names is preserved for backward compatibility.

Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>